Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::open($save_path, $name) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::open(string $path, string $name): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::close() should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::close(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::read($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::read(string $id): string|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::write($session_id, $session_data) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::write(string $id, string $data): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::destroy($session_id) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::destroy(string $id): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
Message: Return type of CI_Session_files_driver::gc($maxlifetime) should either be compatible with SessionHandlerInterface::gc(int $max_lifetime): int|false, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has asserted that the rule of law is alive in the country and official machinery cannot be permitted to be used for oppression, while rapping the Karnal Deputy Commissioner (DC) for displaying complete immaturity and unawareness of the fundamental provisions of the law.
“The Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, would be well advised to be more circumspect in the future,” the High Court asserted. The admonition came in case of a widow allegedly forced to take shelter in a relative’s house after her belongings and other articles were “thrown out” of her “rented” accommodation.
Taking up the petition filed by “tenant” Harjeet Kaur, Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul asserted that the officer had no business of entering a landlord-tenant dispute sub judice in the civil court.
Justice Kaul asserted that strangely, the landlord had approached the DC only with a complaint to register a case against the petitioner for being in unauthorised possession of the house and irregular payment of rent.
